Technical comment on “Reexamination of 2.5-Ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE”
Anbar, A.D.; Buick, R.; Gordon, G.W.; Johnson, A.C.; Kendall, B.; Lyons, T.W.; Ostrander, C.M.; Planavsky, N.J.; Reinhard, C.T.; Stüeken, E.E. (2023). Technical comment on “Reexamination of 2.5-Ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE”. Science Advances 9(14): eabq3736. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq3736
In: Science Advances. AAAS: New York. ISSN 2375-2548; e-ISSN 2375-2548, meer
Is gerelateerd aan:Slotznick, S.P.; Johnson, J.E.; Rasmussen, B.; Raub, T.D.; Webb, S.M.; Zi, J.-W.; Kirschvink, J.L.; Fischer, W.W. (2023). Response to comment on “Reexamination of 2.5-Ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE”. Science Advances 9(14): eadg1530. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg1530, meer
|   |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Anbar, A.D.
- Buick, R.
- Gordon, G.W.
- Johnson, A.C.
|
- Kendall, B.
- Lyons, T.W.
- Ostrander, C.M.
|
- Planavsky, N.J.
- Reinhard, C.T.
- Stüeken, E.E.
|
| Abstract |
Many lines of inorganic geochemical evidence suggest transient “whiffs” of environmental oxygenation before the Great Oxidation Event (GOE). Slotznick et al. assert that analyses of paleoredox proxies in the Mount McRae Shale, Western Australia, were misinterpreted and hence that environmental O2 levels were persistently negligible before the GOE. We find these arguments logically flawed and factually incomplete. |
|
