Global challenges and the Law of the Sea
|
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Ribeiro, M.C., redacteur
- Bastos, F.L., redacteur
- Henriksen, T., redacteur
|
|
|
| Inhoud |
- Singh, P.A. (2020). International organizations and the protection of the marine environment, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 37-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_3, meer
- Koivurova, T.; Kirchner, S.; Kleemola-Juntunen, P. (2020). The Arctic Ocean: Are we ready to govern a new ocean?, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 59-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_4, meer
- Molenaar, E.J. (2020). Regional fisheries management organizations, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 81-109. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_5, meer
- Cardoso, F.C. (2020). Considerations on some global institutional challenges within the context of the conservation and management of marine living resources, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 111-120. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_6, meer
- Teles, P.G. (2020). Sea-level rise in relation to International Law: A new topic for the United Nations International Law Commission, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 145-157. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_8, meer
- Kilpatrick, R.L. (2020). The impact of UN sanctions on commercial shipping activities, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 159-175. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_9, meer
- Fantinato, M. (2020). Maritime surveillance of the EU external sea borders: Extensive approaches and operational challenges to the principles of coastal and flag state jurisdiction in Italy, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 221-235. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_13, meer
- de Serpa Soares, M. (2020). The conservation and sustainable use of the ocean in areas beyond national jurisdiction: Where do we stand?, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 321-332. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_17, meer
- Ricard, P. (2020). The European Union and the future international legally binding instrument on marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 379-399. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_20, meer
- Riccardi, L. (2020). The EU and the UN legally-binding instrument on the areas beyond national jurisdiction, in: Ribeiro, M.C. et al. Global challenges and the Law of the Sea. pp. 401-422. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_21, meer
|
| Abstract |
This book analyses a selection of challenges in the implementation and application of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), focusing on several areas: international organizations, fisheries, security, preserving marine biodiversity, dispute settlement, and interaction with other areas of international law. UNCLOS has been described as the Constitution for the Oceans. It sets out the fundamental rights, obligations and jurisdictions of States regarding the access to, uses and management of the oceans and seas and their resources. It balances States’ diverse and sometimes conflicting interests, such as conflicting uses of space, against navigational interests and the protection of the marine environment. UNCLOS is the first global treaty to include comprehensive obligations on the protection and preservation of the marine environment, including the conservation of living marine resources. These are often common or cross-border challenges, which can only be addressed through international cooperation.
|
|
