IMIS

Publicaties | Instituten | Personen | Datasets | Projecten | Kaarten | Infrastructuur
[ meld een fout in dit record ]mandje (0): toevoegen | toon Print deze pagina

Lepidochronology and internodal length methods for studying Posidonia oceanica growth: are they compatible?
Peirano, A. (2002). Lepidochronology and internodal length methods for studying Posidonia oceanica growth: are they compatible? Aquat. Bot. 74(2): 175-180. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(02)00078-5
In: Aquatic Botany. Elsevier Science: Tokyo; Oxford; New York; London; Amsterdam. ISSN 0304-3770; e-ISSN 1879-1522, meer
Peer reviewed article  

Beschikbaar in  Auteur 

Trefwoorden
    Age determination
    Anatomical structures > Body organs > Plant organs > Rhizomes
    Dating techniques
    Flora > Weeds > Marine organisms > Seaweeds > Sea grass
    MED, Ligurian Sea
    Population functions > Growth
    Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile, 1813 [WoRMS]
    Ligurian Sea [Marine Regions]
    Marien/Kust

Auteur  Top 
  • Peirano, A.

Abstract
    Two techniques to estimate growth of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica are compared. Leaf scale thickness and internodal length of orthotropic rhizomes were measured on the same rhizomes. Yearly cycles from internodal length measurements were in phase with lepidochronological years only after 3 years of rhizome growth. The start of a lepidochronological year roughly corresponded to the yearly maximum of internodal length measurements. Lepidochronology was a more sensitive method for identifying seasonal and yearly cycles. Both methods proved accurate and in agreement when samples exceeded 20 units (rhizomes). A combination of the two methods may improve dating techniques but the limitations should be taken into account when applied to population analysis and to primary production computations.

Alle informatie in het Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) valt onder het VLIZ Privacy beleid Top | Auteur