Spatial segregation between phenotypes of the diablotin black-capped petrel Pterodroma hasitata during the non-breeding period
Satgé, Y.G.; Keitt, B.S.; Gaskin, C.P.; Patteson, J.B.; Jodice, P.G.R. (2023). Spatial segregation between phenotypes of the diablotin black-capped petrel Pterodroma hasitata during the non-breeding period. Endang. Species Res. 51: 183-201. https://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esr01254
In: Endangered Species Research. Inter-Research: Oldendorf/Luhe. ISSN 1613-4796; e-ISSN 1613-4796, more
|   |
| Keywords |
Aves [WoRMS]; Pterodroma hasitata (Kuhl, 1820) [WoRMS]
Marine/Coastal |
| Author keywords |
Distribution · Phenotype · Seabird · Threat exposure · Conservation |
| Authors | | Top |
- Satgé, Y.G.
- Keitt, B.S.
- Gaskin, C.P.
|
- Patteson, J.B.
- Jodice, P.G.R.
|
|
| Abstract |
Despite growing support for ecosystem-based approaches, conservation is mostly implemented at the species level. However, genetic differentiation exists within this taxonomic level, putting genetically distinct populations at risk of local extinction. In the diablotin black-capped petrel Pterodroma hasitata, an endangered gadfly petrel endemic to the Caribbean, 2 phenotypes have been described: a smaller dark form and a heavier light form, which are genetically distinct. To assess possible differences in the marine distributions of phenotypes, in May 2019, we captured 5 adult black-capped petrels of each phenotype at sea in the western North Atlantic and equipped them with satellite transmitters. We used generalized linear mixed models to test the importance of phenotype on geographic distribution. Using kernel density estimations, we located use areas, quantified spatial overlap between forms, and assessed form-specific exposure to marine threats. Petrels were tracked for 11 to 255 d (mean ± SD: 102.1 ± 74.2 d). During the non-breeding period, all individuals ranged from 28.4 to 43.0° latitude. Phenotypes had significantly distinct non-breeding distributions, independent of time of year. The dark form used waters of the Carolinian marine ecoregion, and the light form used pelagic waters of the Virginian ecoregion, to the north. The dark form was more exposed to marine threats than the light form, in particular to mercury, microplastics, and marine traffic. The light form overlapped with proposed wind energy areas off the central US coast. These differences in exposure suggest possible differences in vulnerability, which can have repercussions on the viability of this imperiled species. |
|
