IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Explaining stability and change. Comparing flood risk governance in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Poland
Liefferink, D.; Wiering, M.; Crabbé, A.; Hegger, D. (2017). Explaining stability and change. Comparing flood risk governance in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Poland. J. Flood Risk Man. 11(3): 281-290. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12325
In: Journal of Flood Risk Management. Wiley: Oxford. ISSN 1753-318X; e-ISSN 1753-318X, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Authors  Top 
  • Liefferink, D.
  • Wiering, M.
  • Crabbé, A., more
  • Hegger, D.

Abstract
    The closing article of this special issue provides a comparative analysis of flood risk governance (FRG) in four European countries and tries to explain why FRG in the Netherlands and Poland is more stable than in Belgium and France. It examines the role of mechanisms of path dependency and path change. Inspired by the conceptual framework developed in the introductory article, this article provides an overview of dynamics in FRG in the four countries and identifies major trends and tendencies. It discusses forces of stability and change and hypothesizes on how ‘clusters’ of these forces tend to interact. It is found, among other things, that new ideas are often crucial for initiating change and that fixed costs and the sedimented distribution of responsibilities are stabilising factors. Bringing together various existing theories, the article contributes to literature on flood risk management and public policy change.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors