IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Plant stiffness and biomass as drivers for drag forces under extreme wave loading: A flume study on mimics
Paul, M.; Rupprecht, F.; Möller, I.; Bouma, T.J.; Spencer, T.; Kudella, M.; Wolters, G.; van Wesenbeeck, B.K.; Jensen, K.; Miranda-Lange, M.; Schimmels, S. (2016). Plant stiffness and biomass as drivers for drag forces under extreme wave loading: A flume study on mimics. Coast. Eng. 117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.07.004
In: Coastal Engineering: An International Journal for Coastal, Harbour and Offshore Engineers. Elsevier: Amsterdam; Lausanne; New York; Oxford; Shannon; Tokyo. ISSN 0378-3839; e-ISSN 1872-7379, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    Drag force; Wave forcing; Plant mimics; Stiffness; Biomass; Frontal area

Authors  Top 
  • Paul, M.
  • Rupprecht, F.
  • Möller, I.
  • Bouma, T.J., more
  • Spencer, T.
  • Kudella, M.
  • Wolters, G.
  • van Wesenbeeck, B.K., more
  • Jensen, K.
  • Miranda-Lange, M.
  • Schimmels, S.

Abstract
    Moving water exerts drag forces on vegetation. The susceptibility of vegetation to bending and breakage determines its flow resistance, and chances of survival, under hydrodynamic loading. To evaluate the role of individual vegetation parameters in this water-vegetation interaction, we conducted drag force measurements under a wide range of wave loadings in a large wave flume. Artificial vegetation elements were used to manipulate stiffness, frontal area in still water and material volume as a proxy for biomass. The aim was to compare: (i) identical volume but different still frontal area, (ii) identical stiffness but different still frontal area, and (iii) identical still frontal area but different volume.Comparison of mimic arrangements showed that stiffness and the dynamic frontal area (i.e., frontal area resulting from bending which depends on stiffness and hydrodynamic forcing) determine drag forces. Only at low orbital-flow velocities did the still frontal area dominate the force-velocity relationship and it is hypothesised that no mimic bending took place under these conditions.Mimic arrangements with identical stiffness but different overall material volume and still frontal area showed that forces do not increase linearly with increasing material volume and it is proposed that short distances between mimics cause their interaction and result in additional drag forces. A model, based on effective leaf length and characteristic plant width developed for unidirectional flow, performed well for the force time series under both regular and irregular waves. However, its uncertainty increased with increasing interaction of neighbouring mimics.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors