IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps | Infrastructure
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Seventy years of tunas, billfishes, and sharks as sentinels of global ocean health
Juan-Jordá, M.J.; Murua, H.; Arrizabalaga, H.; Merino, G.; Pacoureau, N.; Dulvy, N.K. (2022). Seventy years of tunas, billfishes, and sharks as sentinels of global ocean health. Science (Wash.) 378(6620): eabj0211. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abj0211
In: Science (Washington). American Association for the Advancement of Science: New York, N.Y. ISSN 0036-8075; e-ISSN 1095-9203, more
Related to:
Burgess, M.G.; Becker, S.L. (2022). Good and bad news for ocean predators. Science (Wash.) 378(6620): 596-597. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.add0342, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Juan-Jordá, M.J.
  • Murua, H.
  • Arrizabalaga, H.
  • Merino, G.
  • Pacoureau, N.
  • Dulvy, N.K.

Abstract
    Tuna and billfishes are large species that have long been targeted by fisheries, whereas sharks, which are also large fishes, have tended to be considered as by-catch or nontarget species. Juan-Jorda et al. used an approach that monitors yearly changes in the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List status to estimate population status for these three groups (see the Perspective by Burgess and Becker). After almost three decades of decline, tuna and billfishes have begun to recover because of proactive fisheries management approaches. Sharks, however, which have received much less conservation attention, have continued to decline. These results both reinforce the value of conservation and management and emphasize the need for immediate implementation of these approaches for sharks.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors