IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps | Infrastructure
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Interactions of larval dynamics and substrate preference have ecological significance for benthic biodiversity and Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 in the presence of Crepidula fornicata
Preston, J.; Fabra, M.; Helmer, L.; Johnson, E.; Harris-Scott, E.; Hendy, I.W. (2020). Interactions of larval dynamics and substrate preference have ecological significance for benthic biodiversity and Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 in the presence of Crepidula fornicata. Aquat. Conserv. 30(11): 2133-2149. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3446
In: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. Wiley: Chichester; New York . ISSN 1052-7613; e-ISSN 1099-0755, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Biodiversity
    Settlement
    Crepidula fornicata (Linnaeus, 1758) [WoRMS]; Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 [WoRMS]
Author keywords
    ecosystem engineer, habitat complexity, invasive species, limpet, oyster spat

Authors  Top 
  • Preston, J.
  • Fabra, M.
  • Helmer, L.
  • Johnson, E.
  • Harris-Scott, E.
  • Hendy, I.W.

Abstract
    Populations of the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis have experienced catastrophic declines across Europe and subsequent spread of the non‐native species Crepidula fornicata has led to its occurrence in exceptionally high densities in some areas previously dominated by O. edulis.
  • Spatial and temporal concurrence of C. fornicata larvae within the zooplankton community occurs throughout the O. edulis spawning season. A C. fornicata larval peak density of 374.7 ± 96.5 larvae/ml (mean ± SD) was observed in Langston Harbour sympatrically with O. edulis density of 45.7 ± 20.1 larvae/ml in early August. Overall oyster larvae contribution to the zooplankton community was higher in Portsmouth Harbour (12%) than C. fornicata contribution (9.6%), whilst the opposite occurred in Langstone (oysters, 11.7%; C. fornicata, 12%).
  • Larval abundance is not reflected in recruitment on the seabed, owing to the conspecific substrate preference of O. edulis. Settlement of O. edulis spat was significantly greater on settlement discs covered with recently deceased oyster shells; 6.7 ± 1.2 (mean ± SE) spat/disc vs old smooth oyster shells, 2.7 ± 1.3, C. fornicata shell 1.7 ± 0.3, cemented discs 2 ± 1 or the plastic control disc 0.7 ± 0.7.
  • Settlement substrate type matters in the presence of high benthic and larval densities of C. fornicata. The Solent has become a substrate‐limited system for O. edulis; substrate management or reef deployment is required to restore a self‐recruiting population.
  • Finally, although C. fornicata may provide functional equivalence in terms of filtering services, it supports a significantly different and less biodiverse faunal community from that of O. edulis. Therefore C. fornicata does not provide equivalence as an ecosystem engineer and mechanisms of ecological phase shift are occurring within areas dominated by this invasive species.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors