The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary-rock nomenclature
Folk, R.L. (1954). The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary-rock nomenclature. J. Geol. 62(4): 344-359. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/626171
In: The Journal of Geology. University of Chicago Press: Chicago,. ISSN 0022-1376; e-ISSN 1537-5269, more
|  |
| Abstract |
A system of grain-size nomenclature of terrigenous sediments and sedimentary rocks is introduced wherein fifteen major textural groups are defined on the ratios of gravel, sand, silt, and clay. Further subdivision of each class is based on the median diameter of each size fraction present. Next, the mineral composition of terrigenous sedimentary rocks is considered. A triangular diagram is used to define eight rock types (orthoquartzite, arkose, graywacke, and five transitional types) based on the mineralogy of the silt-sand-gravel fraction and ignoring clay content. The writer contends that the current practice of calling all clayey sandstones "graywackes" is not valid, inasmuch as it represents a confusion of texture with composition. It is suggested that sedimentary rocks may be best defined by the use of a tripartite name, based on the following pattern-(grain size): (textural maturity) (mineral composition). |
|
