IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps | Infrastructure
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

‘In apparent disagreement with all law of nations in the world’: Negotiating neutrality for shipping and trade during the French revolutionary and Napoleonic wars
Marzagalli, S.; Müller, L. (2016). ‘In apparent disagreement with all law of nations in the world’: Negotiating neutrality for shipping and trade during the French revolutionary and Napoleonic wars. Int .J. Marit. Hist. 28(1): 108-117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0843871415624167
In: International Journal of Maritime History. Maritime Studies Research Unit: St. John's. ISSN 0843-8714; e-ISSN 2052-7756, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    18th century
    19th century
Author keywords
    Denmark, French Revolutionary Wars, neutral rights, neutrality, shipping, Sweden, the United States

Authors  Top 
  • Marzagalli, S.
  • Müller, L.

Abstract
    This Forum deals with maritime trade and shipping conducted by three neutral maritime states in the French Revolutionary Wars: Sweden, Denmark and the United States. The five contributions, based on specific cases of neutral shipping, illustrate the complementarity of neutral and belligerent trade and shipping, and so the significance of neutrality for the continuity of commerce in wartime. The introduction discusseseighteenth-century concepts of neutrality, as neutrals and belligerents understood it. Moreover, it provides a background narrative of the French Revolutionary Wars from the perspective of these three neutral states.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors