Acoustic telemetry and fisheries management
Crossin, G.T.; Heupel, M.R.; Holbrook, C.; Hussey, N.E.; Lowerre-Barbieri, S.K.; Nguyen, V.M.; Raby, G.D.; Cooke, S.J. (2017). Acoustic telemetry and fisheries management. Ecol. Appl. 27(4): 1031-1049. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.1533
In: Ecological Applications. Ecological Society of America: Tempe, AZ. ISSN 1051-0761; e-ISSN 1939-5582, more
|  |
| Author keywords |
Acoustic Telemetry; Policy; Resource Management; Fish Tracking |
| Authors | | Top |
- Crossin, G.T.
- Heupel, M.R.
- Holbrook, C.
- Hussey, N.E.
|
- Lowerre-Barbieri, S.K.
- Nguyen, V.M.
- Raby, G.D.
- Cooke, S.J.
|
|
| Abstract |
This paper reviews the use of acoustic telemetry as a tool for addressing issues in fisheries management, and serves as the lead to the special Feature Issue of Ecological Applications titled “Acoustic Telemetry and Fisheries Management”. Specifically, we provide an overview of the ways in which acoustic telemetry can be used to inform issues central to the ecology, conservation, and management of exploited and/or imperiled fish species. Despite great strides in this area in recent years, there are comparatively few examples where data have been applied directly to influence fisheries management and policy. We review the literature on this issue, identify the strengths and weaknesses of work done to date, and highlight knowledge gaps and difficulties in applying empirical fish telemetry studies to fisheries policy and practice. We then highlight the key areas of managementand policy addressed, as well as the challenges that needed to be overcome to do this. We conclude with a set of recommendations about how researchers can, in consultation with stock assessment scientists and managers, formulate testable scientific questions to address and design future studies to generate data that can be used in a meaningful way by fisheries management and conservation practitioners. We also urge the involvement of relevant stakeholders (managers, fishers, conservation societies, etc.) early on in the process (i.e. in the co-creation of research projects), so that all priority questions and issues can be addressed effectively. |
|
