IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

South Africa's Tsitsikamma Marine Protected Area – winners and losers
Lombard, A.T.; Durbach, I.; Harris, J.M.; Mann-Lang, J.; Mann, B.Q.; Branch, G.M.; Attwood, C.G. (2020). South Africa's Tsitsikamma Marine Protected Area – winners and losers, in: Humphreys, J. et al. Marine protected areas: Science, policy and management. pp. 237-270. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102698-4.00013-7
In: Humphreys, J.; Clark, R.W.E. (Ed.) (2020). Marine protected areas: Science, policy and management. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISBN 978-0-08-102698-4. xxi, 792 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2017-0-02525-9, more

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Pisces [WoRMS]
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Evidence-based decision-making; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Wicked problem; Science-policy interface; Public participation process; Stakeholder consultation; Conservation; Threatened fish

Authors  Top 
  • Lombard, A.T.
  • Durbach, I.
  • Harris, J.M.
  • Mann-Lang, J.
  • Mann, B.Q.
  • Branch, G.M.
  • Attwood, C.G.

Abstract
    Tsitsikamma National Park on the southern coast of South Africa was proclaimed in 1964, making the marine part of the Park Africa's oldest marine protected area. In 2000 the entire marine area was designated as ‘no-take’ with extractive harvesting of resources prohibited. This conservation measure, which was aimed primarily at providing a refuge for highly threatened linefish species and recovery of adjacent fisheries through spill-over effects, has been challenged over the years by local anglers. A government decision in 2016 to lift this restriction for shore-angling along 20% of the coastline met significant public and scientific opposition. We explored the different objectives at play (conservation, economic, social and political) and the rationality of this decision using statistical and decision analytic tools that evaluated the decision and alternative options, and their consequences, for each of the objectives. The decision taken performed poorly against many other rational decision options available to government, and resulted in lose-lose outcomes, rather than achievable win-win outcomes.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors