NARMS name details

Heterosyllis Claparède, 1863

238234  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:238234)

uncertain > nomen dubium
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Species Heterosyllis branchiata Claparède, 1863 (unaccepted > nomen nudum)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Claparède, A. R. É. (1863). Beobachtungen über Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte wirbelloser Thiere: an der Küste von Normandie angestellt. <em>Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.</em> 1-120, 18 plates., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/10030
page(s): 44 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2021). World Polychaeta database. Heterosyllis Claparède, 1863. Accessed through: Costello, M.J.; Bouchet, P.; Boxshall, G.; Arvanitidis, C.; Appeltans, W. (2021) European Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marbef.org/data../aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=238234 on 2024-03-28
Costello, M.J.; Bouchet, P.; Boxshall, G.; Arvanitidis, C.; Appeltans, W. (2024). European Register of Marine Species. Heterosyllis Claparède, 1863. Accessed at: https://vliz.be/vmdcdata/narms/narms.php?p=taxdetails&id=238234 on 2024-03-28
Date
action
by
2007-03-12 09:17:28Z
created
2007-05-08 11:30:48Z
changed
2007-06-04 16:39:43Z
changed
2008-03-05 09:00:37Z
changed
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2015-03-21 23:12:05Z
changed

original description Claparède, A. R. É. (1863). Beobachtungen über Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte wirbelloser Thiere: an der Küste von Normandie angestellt. <em>Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.</em> 1-120, 18 plates., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/10030
page(s): 44 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

status source Nygren, Arne. (2004). Revision of Autolytinae (Syllidae: Polychaeta). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 680: 1-314., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2004f/z00680f.pdf [details]  Available for editors  PDF available 
From regional or thematic species database
Remark Type material of the genus does not exist. According to Nygren (2004) it should be considered nomen dubium [details]