|
|
WoRMS taxon details
NomenclatureTaxonomystatus source
Kupriyanova, Elena K. and Macdonald, Tara A. and Rouse, G.W. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships within Serpulidae (Sabellida, Annelida) inferred from molecular and morphological data. Zoologica Scripta 35(5): 421-439. note: molecular data group Salmacina and Filograna, but no distinct Filograninae group exists [details]
status source
Kupriyanova, Elena; ten Hove, Harry; Rouse, Greg W. (2023). Phylogeny of Serpulidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) inferred from morphology and DNA sequences, with a new classification. <em>Diversity.</em> 15(3), 398: 1-24., available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/3/398 note: Filograninae is re-established, based on molecular and morphological analysis, supported by presence of abdominal flat geniculate chaetae. [details] Available for editors [request]
Otheradditional source
Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf note: usage [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Re-established subfamily. Created by Rioja to include Serpulidae with pinnules on the operculum stalk. He included genera Filograna, Salmacina, Apomatus, and Protula (Salmacina and Protula lack opercula). Fauchald (1977) included Filograna and Salmacina, and also Filogranula, Salmacinopsis and Spirodiscus. Molecular data of Kupriyanova et al (2006) grouped Salmacina and Filograna, but in wider view no justification for a distinct Filograninae clade existed. Subsequently Kupriyanova, ten Hove & Rouse, 2023 re-established Filograninae, based on molecular and morphological analysis, supported by presence of abdominal flat geniculate chaetae. [details]
|
|
|