|
|
[search] [browse] [match] [login]
WoRMS taxon details
taxonomy source
Bahia, J.; Padula, V.; Schrödl, M. (2017). Polycladida phylogeny and evolution: integrating evidence from 28S rDNA and morphology. <em>Organisms Diversity & Evolution.</em> 17(3): 653-678., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-017-0327-5 [details] Available for editors  [request]
basis of record
Schockaert, E. R.; Jouk, P. E. H.; Martens, P. M. (1989). Free-living Plathelminthes from the Belgian coast and adjacent areas. <em>In: Wouters, K.; Baert, L. (Ed.) (1989). Proceedings of the Symposium Invertebrates of Belgium.</em> pp. 19-25. (look up in IMIS) [details] 
basis of record
Faubel, A. (1984). The Polycladida, Turbellaria; Proposal and establishment of a new system. Part 2. The Cotylea. <em>Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut.</em> 81: 189-259. [details] Available for editors [request]
basis of record
Faubel, A. (1983). The Polycladida, Turbellaria - Proposal and estalishment of a new system Part I. The Acotylea. <em>Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut.</em> 80: 17-121. [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Aguado, M. T.; Noreña, C.; Alcaraz, L.; Marquina, D.; Brusa, F.; Damborenea, C.; Almon, B.; Bleidorn, C.; Grande, C. (2017). Phylogeny of Polycladida (Platyhelminthes) based on mtDNA data. <em>Organisms Diversity & Evolution.</em> 17(4): 767-778., available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320044928_Phylogeny_of_Polycladida_Platyhelminthes_based_on_mtDNA_data [details]
additional source
Kenny, N. J.; Noreña, C.; Damborenea, C.; Grande, C. (2018). Probing recalcitrant problems in polyclad evolution and systematics with novel mitochondrial genome resources. <em>Genomics.</em> , available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.02.009 [details]
additional source
Litvaitis, M. K.; Bolaños, D. M.; Quiroga, S. Y. (2019). Systematic congruence in Polycladida (Platyhelminthes, Rhabditophora): are DNA and morphology telling the same story?. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> , available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz007 [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Dittmann, I. L.; Cuadrado, D.; Aguado, M. T.; Noreña, C.; Egger, B. (2019). Polyclad phylogeny persists to be problematic. <em>Organisms Diversity & Evolution.</em> 19(4): 585-608., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-019-00415-1 [details] Available for editors [request]
status source
Dittmann, I. L.; Cuadrado, D.; Aguado, M. T.; Noreña, C.; Egger, B. (2019). Polyclad phylogeny persists to be problematic. <em>Organisms Diversity & Evolution.</em> 19(4): 585-608., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-019-00415-1 [details] Available for editors [request]
 Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Classification The classification used here is a compromise between the more traditional taxonomy of Neodermata vs. the turbellarians. Yet it reflects the fact that Neodermata is within free-living flatworms (i.e. turbellaria are paraphyletic). It mentions all traditional taxa that are found in phylogenetic studies (e.g. Laumer et al., 2015). Many of the "in-between" higher level taxa (such as Trepaxonemata etc.) are no longer in WoRMS (probably more user friendly that way). This also means an asymmetry between turbellarians (nine ordines) and Neodermata (superclass with three classes). [details]
|
OCEAN-UKRAINE is a project Supported by the Flemish Government - Department of Foreign Affairs
Website hosted by the Flanders Marine Institute VLIZ
|
