NARMS name details

Laemophiurina

123116  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123116)

Matsumoto, 1915
 unaccepted
Suborder
marine
Matsumoto, H. (1915). A new classification of the Ophiuroidea: with description of new genera and species. <em>Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.</em> 68: 43-92., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1708443 [details]   
Taxonomy This taxon is currently not regarded as monophyletic and thus has no accepted synonym.  
Taxonomy This taxon is currently not regarded as monophyletic and thus has no accepted synonym. [details]
Stöhr, S.; O’Hara, T.; Thuy, B. (Eds) (2021). World Ophiuroidea Database. Laemophiurina. Accessed through: Costello, M.J.; Bouchet, P.; Boxshall, G.; Arvanitidis, C.; Appeltans, W. (2021) European Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marbef.org/data/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=123116 on 2021-04-14
Costello, M.J.; Bouchet, P.; Boxshall, G.; Arvanitidis, C.; Appeltans, W. (2021). European Register of Marine Species. Laemophiurina. Accessed at: http://vliz.be/vmdcdata/narms/narms.php?p=taxdetails&id=123116 on 2021-04-14
Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2005-12-30 14:07:12Z
changed
2008-10-09 13:45:02Z
checked

original description Matsumoto, H. (1915). A new classification of the Ophiuroidea: with description of new genera and species. <em>Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.</em> 68: 43-92., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1708443 [details]   

basis of record Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). , available online at http://www.itis.gov [details]   

additional source Hansson, H.G. (2001). Echinodermata, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i>. 50: pp. 336-351. (look up in IMIS[details]   
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy This taxon is currently not regarded as monophyletic and thus has no accepted synonym. [details]